Did Pierre Poilievre Never Learn the Law of Cause & Effect?? Or, Does He Think We're All Stupid

I was kind of shocked when I saw Pierre Poilievre taking credit for the dropping of Canadian travel mandates, now scheduled to end October 1/2022. Even after witnessing his opportunistic behaviour over the past couple of years; being silent on topics that are difficult and only speaking up when it’s easy, when it’s backed by momentum and fad ( ie; following polls and political movements, like showing up at the Trucker Convoy and speaking about freedom after being silent for two years during infringements on rights & freedoms, and the millions of Canadians experiencing medical discrimination; or showing up to ‘Canada Marches’ in khakis and penny loafers to walk for less than 1km — just long enough to have his picture taken with James Topp).

Claiming ownership over a political outcome that you were silent on, and that you took zero action on, is a very bold move. It takes balls to do that, sort of. It takes less balls in Canada because most people are too indiscriminately tolerant — or too afraid to stand out, speak up, and to call someone’s bullshit for what it is — but it still takes balls. Most Canadians have been indoctrinated to tolerate anything and everything — from obvious lies to blatant contradictions — because we’re good ol’ polite Canadians and we’ve been programmed to not rock the boat. They will however speak up when it’s to virtue signal or to play the victim. Most Canadian’s won’t acknowledge or speak up to point out that Pierre is claiming a result that he did not cause in any way whatsoever. But not this Canadian, I’ll call out your lies, deception, and inaction without hesitation — and there are many Canadians with real conservative values that are wise to Pierre’s pragmatic opportunism and flimsy spine when it comes to integrity and conservative values.

So how can Pierre claim that his inactions had impact on this change? Is his arrogance so strong that he believes he can affect change by simply existing? Does he believe that becoming the new leader of the the most un-oppositional Opposition Party in Canadian history; the Liberal-Lite Conservative Party, which is more progressive than the Liberal Party itself was two decades ago — that his new leadership appointment set ripples across the country, shaking mountains and cascading into the courtrooms, the health expert’s and policy maker’s boardrooms; intimidating everyone into giving us our travel rights back…without actually saying or doing anything? Do you think he believes that? Maybe he does, it’s possible, but I don’t think it’s arrogance. Even though I think most career politicians are highly narcissistic, I don’t think any are that naive. I mean, Pierre often likes to use phrases like, “Canadian’s learned that in grade 4” or “Anyone that paid attention in elementary school learned that…” so we can’t say that he never learned the basic Law of Cause and Effect or the simple concept of Causality. Pierre if you’re reading this, just in case, here you go big guy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality

OR PERHAPS….

…was the policy already set to expire on September 30; was there absolutely ZERO scientific evidence to continue to implement such non-sensical mandates — AND there exists hundreds and hundreds of studies to prove that the interventions do not work (More than 400 Studies of Failed COVID Interventions); AND were Real Freedom Valued Canadians fighting for our rights in the court rooms across the country? Perhaps that is what caused the change. Do you think that Pierre respects your intellect when he claims that he had a hand in these changes? Do you think that he thinks you won’t notice — because he thinks You don’t understand cause and effect? Is this false claim of his, his attempting to take credit for something he had zero part in, indicative of a newer, honest, and trustworthy politician? Or is just another same’ol POS politician in a different suit?